Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation implementation in Africa faces multidimensional barriers that a scoping review protocol will explore.
Why the study?
Despite the established benefits of cardiac rehabilitation for cardiovascular disease, its availability, utilization, and specific landscape across Africa remain poorly understood due to multidimensional barriers.
This scoping review protocol outlines a plan to explore patient-level, technological, and systemic barriers to cardiac rehabilitation in Africa to inform future hybrid delivery models.
CR scale-up may address Africa's disproportionate CVD burden; leaves open optimal implementation pending local trials.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents the most significant non-communicable disease burden globally, contributing more to morbidity and mortality than any other condition. Africa carries a disproportionately heavy portion of this burden, with CVDs remaining the leading contributors to illness and death across the region. As a critical secondary prevention strategy, Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) offers a multidisciplinary framework designed to enhance patient recovery and prevent future cardiac events. Modern CR has advanced into an inclusive approach that integrates traditional exercise-based training with comprehensive education, nutritional and weight management, risk factor modification, and counseling personalized to individual patient needs. Traditionally delivered through center-based models, CR is now increasingly complemented by pioneering non-center-based remote approaches utilizing telehealth, virtual reality, wearable sensor-assisted home programs, and smartphone applications. While evidence suggests that home-based CR is a safe and effective alternative—showing outcomes comparable to center-based delivery—the specific landscape of these programs across Africa remains poorly understood. Despite the established benefits of CR in improving functional status and long-term quality of life, its availability and utilization across the continent are critically limited. The primary challenge lies in the multidimensional barriers to CR in Africa, which span patient-level, technological, and systemic domains. At the patient level, limited digital literacy and physical comorbidities are often compounded by cultural fatalism and gender-based restrictions on health autonomy. These issues are intensified by structural technology barriers, such as unreliable connectivity and high data costs, alongside severe health system failures characterized by a near-total absence of formal programs and trained professionals. Furthermore, socioeconomic and contextual challenges, including language mismatches and rural isolation, prevent equitable access, while cross-cutting issues like a weak local evidence base hinder the scaling of sustainable solutions. This paper aims to explore these barriers to provide a foundation for co-designed, hybrid models that can ensure effective CR delivery within the African context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demoz et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated. Cardiac rehabilitation implementation in Africa faces multidimensional patient-level, technological, and systemic barriers, which this scoping review protocol aims to systematically explore.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: