Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 25, 2026Open Access

Professional Responsibility in the Age of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Framework for Ethical Implementation in Legal Practice

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ASAlex Shahrestani

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Framework proposes ethical AI use in legal practice, emphasizing verification to avoid malpractice and sanctions.

Key Points

  • This work assesses the ethical implications and legal responsibilities associated with the use of generative AI in law.
  • Examined regulatory opinions on AI use in legal contexts.
  • Analyzed documented instances of AI-related legal issues.
  • Proposed a risk-graded implementation model for lawyers.
  • Documented 950 instances of courts addressing AI-generated fabrications.
  • Established risk of sanctions and malpractice for non-compliant AI use.
  • Introduced the 'Lawyer-in-the-Loop' framework for ethical AI implementation.

Cite This Study

Alex Shahrestani (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b8a88ba6daa22dad115https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19702781
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1GENERAL AI LEGAL PRACTICE HALLUCINATIONS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILTY AND THE NECESSITY OF HUMAN OVERSIGHT2026
  2. 2Generative AI in American and Canadian courts: a ‘training’ approach to regulation2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Generative Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice: Use and Regulation2025
  4. 4Generative AI systems in legal practice offering quality legal services while upholding legal ethics2025 · 4 citations
  5. 5Generative Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice: Epistemic Expertise, Unethical AI, and the Role of Virtue2026 · 2 citations