Essay examines perplexity in literary analysis, highlighting its role in understanding Hill's work and beyond.
This essay explores "perplexity" as a feature of Geoffrey Hill's poetry and prose, and thereby argues for its categorical salience in literary criticism. Drawing on a range of writers in addition to Hill—Theodor Adorno, Hannah Arendt, Michael Clune, Emily Dickinson, and others—it presents perplexity both as cognitive difficulty and as a description of excitingly unresolved reading. Such perplexity, the essay argues, throws us into "the live mediatedness that precedes knowing," and entails a kind of critical judgment that emerges from the phenomenology of reading itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Rizq (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: