Key result
MSCT accurately differentiates coronary plaque composition across soft, intermediate, and calcified lesions.
Why the study?
Reliable noninvasive assessment of coronary plaque configuration is needed for risk stratification in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Does multislice computed tomography accurately determine coronary lesion configuration compared to intracoronary ultrasound in patients with coronary plaques?
Comparison
Multislice computed tomography vs intracoronary ultrasound
Design
Cross-sectional study
Authors
Loading...
May allow noninvasive vulnerable plaque detection by MSCT; leaves open clinical utility pending larger validation.
Cross-Sectional (n=15)
Does multislice computed tomography accurately determine coronary lesion configuration compared to intracoronary ultrasound in patients with coronary plaques?
p-value: p=<0.0001
MSCT can noninvasively differentiate coronary plaque composition (soft, intermediate, calcified) with density values correlating with intracoronary ultrasound findings.
Schroeder et al. (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Known or suspected coronary artery disease (n=15). Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) vs. Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) was evaluated on Plaque density (Hounsfield units) across soft, intermediate, and calcified plaques (p=<0.0001). Multislice computed tomography significantly differentiated coronary plaque composition, with distinct densities for soft (14±26 HU), intermediate (91±21 HU), and calcified (419±194 HU) plaques (P<0.0001).