Retrospective cohort study compares eradication rates and safety of therapies in children, suggesting benefits for quadruple therapy.
Purpose To compare the eradication efficacy, symptom improvement, and safety between standard triple therapy and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection in children. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 161 pediatric patients who completed either a 14-day triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, amoxicillin; n = 78) or a 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (adding colloidal bismuth subcitrate; n = 83). The primary outcome was the eradication rate assessed by 13 C-urea breath test 4 weeks post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in abdominal pain, bloating, and nausea scores (measured by a 4-point Likert scale before and after treatment) and the incidence of adverse events. Results The eradication rate was significantly higher in the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group (90.36%) compared to the triple therapy group (74.36%) ( P = 0.007). Post-treatment symptom scores improved more markedly with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for abdominal pain (0.68 vs. 0.85, P < 0.001), bloating (0.55 vs. 0.64, P = 0.021), and nausea (0.35 vs. 0.41, P = 0.024). In a subgroup analysis restricted to patients with successful eradication, the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group still had significantly lower abdominal pain scores ( P = 0.002), suggesting a potential independent effect of bismuth on abdominal pain relief. The incidence of adverse events and the medication compliance rate were comparable between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as a protective factor against eradication failure (Adjusted OR = 0.351, P = 0.018). Conclusion Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is potentially advantageous to standard triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori and alleviating associated symptoms in children, with a similar safety and compliance profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: