PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Geotechnics0 citationsOpen Access

Rapid Factor Screening for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of Linear Engineering Slopes Using a Reduced-Factor Information Value Model: A Case Study of the Jing-Zhang Railway, China

View Full Paper
ZSZijing SongCHChunyang HuZRZhixing Ren

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a rapid screening framework for landslide susceptibility using fewer factors in linear engineering projects.
  • Developed a reduced-factor screening framework based on the Information Value model.
  • Established a conventional 10-factor model as a reference with 94.87% accuracy.
  • Compared reduced-factor models maintaining the same study area and landslide inventory.
  • Two five-factor models demonstrated the same accuracy of 94.87% as the full 10-factor model.
  • Models included factors like Slope, Aspect, Elevation, and Engineering Rock.
  • The simplified models retain accuracy while allowing for greater efficiency in hazard screening.

Abstract

Rapid landslide susceptibility screening is important for linear engineering projects because long corridors, numerous slope units, limited data, and tight schedules often restrict the use of data-intensive models. This study develops an engineering-oriented reduced-factor screening framework based on the Information Value (IV) model and applies the framework to the Beijing-Zhangjiakou Railway corridor. A conventional 10-factor IV model was first established as the reference model. Reduced-factor models were then screened under the same study area, the same landslide inventory, the same modelling workflow, and the same factor classification scheme. The 10-factor model reached an accuracy of 94.87%. Two reduced five-factor models reached the same accuracy: Slope + Aspect + Elevation + Lithology and Engineering Rock + NDVI, and Slope + Aspect + Elevation + Lithology and Engineering Rock + Distance to Rivers. The comparison shows that the full-factor model can be simplified without loss of validation accuracy when a stable terrain–geological framework is retained and a suitable external factor is added. Because the available inventory contains only 45 landslides and does not distinguish failure mechanisms consistently, the proposed model should be regarded as a preliminary probabilistic screening tool rather than a mechanism-specific prediction model. The proposed framework provides a practical approach for corridor-scale hazard screening under incomplete data conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Song et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabb84a46254e215b397dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics6020041
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper