Single-arm trial evaluates weight loss intervention in Black breast cancer survivors, suggesting positive outcomes.
This single-arm proof-of-concept study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of ‘Survivors RESET’, a stress management-enhanced behavioral weight loss intervention for Black female breast cancer survivors with obesity and high perceived stress. Participants received a 16-session, 4-month intervention based on the core curriculum of the Diabetes Prevention Program, enhanced with stress management and cancer-relevant content. Feasibility benchmarks were ≥ 45% enrollment, ≥ 75% retention, and ≥ 70% adherence; acceptability was ≥ 80% satisfaction. Exploratory weight loss analyses were performed. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests assessed changes from baseline to 4 months. Twenty women (90.9% of eligible individuals) enrolled (mean age: 57.9 ± 7.7 years; BMI: 37.10 ± 6.40 kg/m2). All participants (100%) completed baseline and 4-month assessments, and 95% attended ≥ 70% of sessions, supporting the feasibility of the study. Regarding acceptability, 75% were “somewhat satisfied” or “very satisfied,” and 95% would recommend the program. Significant reductions were observed in weight (− 2.4 ± 3.4 kg, p = 0.006), BMI (− 0.9 ± 1.2 kg/m2, p = 0.006), and perceived stress score (− 6.9 ± 8.9, p = 0.003). The intervention was feasible and generally well-accepted, though acceptability ratings fell slightly below our high benchmark. It also showed promise for weight loss, supporting the need for a full-scale trial in Black female breast cancer survivors. Integrating stress management into a culturally tailored behavioral weight loss intervention may enhance outcomes for Black breast cancer survivors. These findings support the need for a full-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate its effectiveness and potential impact on clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigues et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: