Retrospective study compares NLR and CRP effectiveness in identifying severe acute cholangitis, suggesting limited value.
Background and Objectives: Early identification of patients at risk for severe forms of acute cholangitis (AC) is crucial for guiding prompt therapeutic interventions. In addition to traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), newer indices like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are cost-effective and easy-to-use diagnostic tools. In the context of limited evidence from Eastern European populations, this study aimed to compare the performance of NLR and CRP in identifying organ dysfunction-based severe presentation of acute cholangitis according to a modified TG18-derived classification. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including patients admitted to Colentina Clinical Hospital between January 2021 and September 2025. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from medical records, with a focus on admission inflammatory biomarkers: NLR and CRP. Symptom onset-to-presentation time was not recorded. Patients were stratified by disease severity according to a modified organ dysfunction-based severity classification, and comparative statistical analysis, including Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, was performed to assess the diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values of both biomarkers for severe clinical presentation. Results: A total of 364 patients were included, with a median age of 68 years (IQR: 60–78), and a slight female predominance (55.5%). Of these, 231 were classified as non-severe and 133 as severe. Both CRP and NLR were significantly higher in severe cases (p = 0.042 and p = 0.018, respectively. Despite statistical significance, CRP showed limited discriminatory ability, whereas NLR showed only a marginal numerical advantage. ROC analysis showed poor discriminatory ability for both CRP (AUC = 0.564, 95% CI 0.503–0.624, p = 0.042) and NLR (AUC = 0.574, 95% CI 0.513–0.635, p = 0.018) in predicting severe AC incidence. The difference between AUCs was minimal (ΔAUC = 0.010, 95% CI −0.062 to 0.082, p = 0.78, DeLong test). Conclusions: Both CRP and NLR showed limited discriminatory performance in identifying organ dysfunction-based severe presentation of acute cholangitis. The small, non-significant difference between the two markers does not support a meaningful comparative advantage, and neither biomarker appears suitable for reliable early risk stratification on its own.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angelescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: