Why the study?
The term cardiorenal syndrome has increasingly been used without a consistent or well-accepted definition.
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Initially, cardiologists paid a lot of attention to cardiorenal syndromes. There was a paper from Claude Ronco and colleagues published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology defining cardiorenal syndromes as five different entities depending on whether it is the heart that is the culprit or the kidney or both. This was already something really interesting because the cardiology community paid more attention to this category. That said 10 years after, with my colleagues, we revisited it in a white paper published Circulation because we perceived that there is a true continuum in cardiorenal disease.”
May aid phenotyping in cardiorenal syndrome; leaves open whether subtype-specific strategies improve outcomes in prospective studies.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Ronco et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: