Why the study?
With the emergence of transcatheter solutions for tricuspid regurgitation, assessing valve morphology, regurgitation severity, and RV function poses challenges to cardiac imagers guiding transcatheter procedures.
This review highlights the critical role of modern imaging modalities in assessing valve morphology, quantifying regurgitation severity, and guiding transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modern imaging warrants routine consideration for tricuspid assessment and interventions; leaves open prospective validation of standardized protocols.
With the emergence of transcatheter solutions for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) increased attention has been directed to the once neglected tricuspid valve (TV) complex. Recent studies have highlighted new aspects of valve anatomy and TR etiology. The assessment of valve morphology along with quantification of regurgitation severity and RV function pose several challenges to cardiac imagers guiding transcatheter valve procedures. This review article aims to give an overview over the role of modern imaging modalities during assessment and treatment of the TV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winkel et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: