Key result
Isolated clinically significant TR is linked to ~68% higher mortality versus trivial TR.
Why the study?
The prevalence, cause distribution, and clinical significance of tricuspid regurgitation in the community setting are mostly unknown.
Population
417 adult residents of Olmsted County diagnosed with moderate or greater TR by Doppler echocardiography
Comparison
Isolated TR versus trivial TR matched for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, and comorbidity index
Design
Community-based cohort study
Authors
Loading...
Cohort study reveals increased mortality from clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation in community residents, highlighting an undertreated public health burden.
Cohort (n=417)
No
Relative Risk: 1.68 (95% CI 1.04–2.6)
p-value: p=0.03
Topilsky et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=417). Isolated clinically significant (≥moderate) tricuspid regurgitation vs. Matched cases with trivial tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on Mortality (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04-2.60, p=0.03). Isolated clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation was associated with higher mortality compared to matched cases with trivial TR (adjusted RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.04-2.60; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: