Key result
Renal microcirculatory dysfunction drives acute kidney injury in heart failure and cardiac surgery.
This review highlights the critical role of renal microcirculatory dysfunction in the pathogenesis of CKD in heart failure and AKI following cardiac surgery.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 50% of patients with heart failure. The pathophysiology of CKD in heart failure is proposed to be driven by macrocirculatory hemodynamic changes, including reduced cardiac output and elevated central venous pressure. However, our understanding of renal microcirculation in heart failure and CKD remains limited. This is largely due to the lack of noninvasive techniques to assess renal microcirculation in patients. Moreover, there is a lack of clinically relevant animal models of heart failure and CKD to advance our understanding of the timing and magnitude of renal microcirculatory dysfunction. Patients with heart failure and CKD commonly require cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to improve their prognosis. However, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent unresolved clinical complication in these patients. There is emerging evidence that renal microcirculatory dysfunction, characterized by renal medullary hypoperfusion and hypoxia, plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of cardiac surgery-associated AKI. In this review, we consolidate the preclinical and clinical evidence of renal macro- and microcirculatory perturbations in heart failure and cardiac surgery requiring CPB. We also examine emerging biomarkers and therapies that may improve health outcomes for this vulnerable patient population by targeting the renal microcirculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trask‐Marino et al. (2025) conducted a review in Heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and acute kidney injury. This review consolidates evidence on renal macro- and microcirculatory perturbations in heart failure and cardiac surgery, highlighting the critical role of microcirculatory dysfunction in AKI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: