Why the study?
Does non-obstructive angioscopy reveal vulnerable aortic plaques and injuries in a patient with a shaggy aorta?
Does non-obstructive angioscopy reveal vulnerable aortic plaques and injuries in a patient with a shaggy aorta?
Non-obstructive angioscopy can safely reveal detailed characteristics of vulnerable plaques and injuries in a shaggy aorta that are not visible on CT angiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case-level data suggest NOA may uncover CT-occult aortic vulnerability; leaves open its role in guiding therapy for shaggy aorta.
A shaggy aorta is reportedly related to atheromatous embolisation, which causes serious ischaemic damage to various organs. However, its characteristics are poorly understood. Non-obstructive angioscopy (NOA) has been developed to safely detect aortic plaques and injuries. A 70-year-old woman who was found to have a shaggy aorta on CT angiography underwent NOA for precise evaluation of vulnerable aortic plaques and injuries inside the aorta. Vulnerable aortic plaques included puff-like ruptures, chandelier-like ruptures and erosions seen throughout the aorta. Aortic injuries included flaps, slits, subintimal bleeding, dissection and multilayered partitions. The patient had no embolic symptoms or an elevated eosinophil count, estimated glomerular filtration rate or C reactive protein level, compared with the baseline. Various changes in spontaneous vulnerable plaques and injuries inside the aorta that were not apparent on CT were safely revealed on NOA. Thus, NOA may reveal findings indicative of spontaneous and postoperative atheromatous embolisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komatsu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: