What question did this study set out to answer?

This review aims to synthesize assessment adaptations in STEM education due to the impact of generative AI technologies.

April 27, 2026Open Access

The Evolution of Assessment in STEM Education Amidst the Generative AI Era: A Systematic Review of Pedagogical Shifts and Academic Integrity

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This review aims to synthesize assessment adaptations in STEM education due to the impact of generative AI technologies.
Conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA 2020 protocol.
Synthesized findings from 52 peer-reviewed articles across STEM disciplines from 2022 to 2026.
Applied a seven-criterion quality appraisal adapted from the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Identified three pedagogical response paradigms within the ARIA Framework: AI-Resistance, AI-Incorporated, and AI-Leading.
Critiqued the reliability of AI-detection software, particularly for non-native English speakers.
Reconceptualized critical thinking into three competencies: AI Output Literacy, Epistemic Autonomy, and Collaborative Orchestration.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Systematic review maps assessment responses in STEM education, highlighting pedagogical changes and integrity issues.

et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark