Key result
Glucotrack intravascular CBGM achieves ~7% MARD versus a handheld glucometer in an ovine model.
Why the study?
Implantable intravascular continuous blood glucose monitors offer a promising approach for accurate glucose measurement with short lag times and improved reliability over conventional handheld or point-of-care glucometers.
Does the Glucotrack intravascular continuous blood glucose monitor accurately measure glucose levels compared to a reference glucometer in an ovine model?
Does the Glucotrack intravascular continuous blood glucose monitor accurately measure glucose levels compared to a reference glucometer in an ovine model?
The Glucotrack intravascular continuous blood glucose monitor demonstrated high accuracy (MARD 6.84%) and safety over 30-240 days in an ovine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishes proof-of-concept for long-term intravascular CBGM; leaves open clinical safety, accuracy, and durability in humans.
Implantable intravascular continuous blood glucose monitors (CBGMs) offer a promising approach for accurately measuring glucose levels with short lag times and improved reliability when compared with conventional laboratory-based point-of-care or handheld glucometers. In this study, 34 Glucotrack long-term intravascular CBGM devices were implanted into 17 adult sheep, with one device placed in each jugular vein. Each implantation was completed in approximately 20 min and did not require any customized tools or techniques. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) were performed approximately monthly throughout the studies (30-240 days postimplantation) and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) values were calculated against an Accu-Chek Guide handheld glucometer as the reference standard. The weighted average MARD was 6.84% for all 34 devices during a total of 79 IVGTTs. In addition, no device-related adverse safety events were observed during this long-term in vivo proof-of-concept evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tapsak et al. (2026) studied Blood glucose monitoring (n=17). Glucotrack long-term intravascular CBGM devices vs. Accu-Chek Guide handheld glucometer was evaluated on Mean absolute relative difference (MARD). The Glucotrack intravascular continuous blood glucose monitor demonstrated a weighted average mean absolute relative difference of 6.84% compared to a handheld glucometer in an ovine model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: