Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares detection efficacy of filtered-phase imaging and SWI for paramagnetic rim lesions in multiple sclerosis, indicating differing strengths in predictive value and sensitivity.
Both techniques reliably detect PRLs with substantial inter-rater agreement. Filtered-phase imaging offers superior positive predictive value, while SWI provides better sensitivity and inter-rater reliability. Further development of a standardized training program for assessment of PRL and studies directly comparing susceptibility-sensitive sequences on different vendor platforms are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: