Pre-print introduces deterministic system architecture for executing autonomous agentic governance.
The proliferation of autonomous agentic systems has exposed the structural fragility of probabilistic, software-only governance models. Current enterprise AI governance relies on 'Software Hope' — the belief that probabilistic models can accurately police their own authority through mutable instructions. This ambiguity leads to a critical measurement gap where stochastic inference models are trusted to self-report their constraint states, resulting in the collapse of authority into self-validated execution. To resolve this structural deficit, we introduce a deterministic ontology anchored in Sanskrit, providing strict semantic isolation for the architectural primitives of the Agentic Era. This paper defines four core components of the Sovereign Spine architecture — (1) Sankalpa (The Decision Authority), a cryptographic vow binding identity and intent to the immediate moment of execution; (2) Sakshi (The Reasoning Witness), a hardware-witnessed observer decoupled from the stochastic inference layer; (3) Pramana (The Admissible Proof), the unforgeable artifact attesting to the deterministic validity of the reasoning chain; and (4) Mudra (The Single-Use Key), a cryptographic seal required to bridge logical reasoning to physical execution on the hardware root of trust. By deploying these primitives within a hexagonal architecture, we establish a framework for an Insurable Substrate, shifting agentic governance from fragile compliance scaffolding to physical, hardware-enforced necessity. Context This pre-print establishes the formal architectural nomenclature for hardware-enforced execution control in autonomous agentic systems, expanding upon the foundational concepts of the Citadel Protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theo Ezell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: