Prospective case series reveals intranasal esketamine improves symptoms in treatment-resistant OCD with comorbid depression, suggesting potential benefits.
Patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) represent a severe subgroup with increased treatment resistance, greater functional impairment, and limited therapeutic options. Intranasal esketamine is a rapidly acting treatment for resistant depression, with emerging interest in potential anti-obsessional effects. However, prospective data in this comorbid population remain lacking. We present eight adult cases (mean age 47.3 ± 8.8 years) with treatment-resistant OCD (TR-OCD) and comorbid MDD treated at Bellvitge University Hospital. All patients had failed at least two adequate SSRI trials, clomipramine, cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention, and at least one pharmacological augmentation strategy. Intranasal esketamine (56–84 mg/session) was administered according to the standard antidepressant protocol over 12 weeks. Response was defined as ≥ 35% reduction in Y-BOCS and ≥ 50% reduction in MADRS. Depressive symptoms improved substantially, with MADRS scores decreasing by 48.8% at Week 12 (p = 0.0026). Obsessive-compulsive symptoms showed a more modest and heterogeneous reduction, with a 30.3% decrease in Y-BOCS scores (p = 0.0037). Four of the eight participants (50.0%) achieved depression response, including two (25.0%) remissions, and four of the eight participants (50.0%) met OCD response criteria. Depressive symptoms improved earlier, whereas OCD symptoms followed a slower and more variable trajectory. Repeated intranasal esketamine may offer a therapeutic window for patients with severe TR-OCD and comorbid MDD. These preliminary findings support further controlled studies to clarify its role, optimal administration, and integration with psychotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López-Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: