Why the study?
Does moderate intensity anticoagulation with warfarin reduce bleeding complications compared to high intensity anticoagulation without increasing thromboembolism in patients with prosthetic heart valves?
Does moderate intensity anticoagulation with warfarin reduce bleeding complications compared to high intensity anticoagulation without increasing thromboembolism in patients with prosthetic heart valves?
Moderate-intensity warfarin (INR ~2.65) provides equivalent protection against thromboembolism as high-intensity warfarin (INR ~9) in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves, but with a significantly lower risk of bleeding.
Moderate-intensity anticoagulation reduces bleeding without excess thromboembolism in mechanical valves; confirms lower INR targets as standard.
We compared the efficacy and complications of anticoagulation with warfarin in 258 patients with prosthetic heart valves treated with regimens of "moderate intensity" (prothrombin-time ratio, 1.5; international normalized ratio, 2.65) or "high intensity" (prothrombin-time ratio, 2.5; international normalized ratio, 9) in a prospective, randomized study. The two patient groups were followed up for 421 patient-years and 436 patient-years, respectively. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up. Thromboembolism occurred with similar frequency in the two groups (4.0 and 3.7 episodes per 100 patient-years, respectively), but there was a total of 6.2 bleeding episodes per 100 patient-years in the moderate-intensity group, as compared with 12.1 episodes in the high-intensity group (P less than 0.002). There were 5.2 episodes of minor bleeding per 100 patient-years in the moderate-intensity group, as compared with 10.1 episodes in the high-intensity group (P less than 0.01). Major bleeding was also more common in the high-intensity group (2.1 episodes per 100 patient-years--including the only two fatal hemorrhages--as compared with 0.95 episode in the moderate-intensity group), but the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that a moderate anticoagulant effect (prothrombin-time ratio, about 1.5) in patients with a mechanical prosthetic heart valve offers protection equivalent to that of more intensive therapy, but at a significantly lower risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saour et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: