Case study analyzes deferred tax liabilities in financial statements, suggesting improved professional judgment with AI tools.
This study examines how students develop professional judgment by analyzing the “Income Taxes” footnotes of Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. The design guides a four-step workflow: (1) compute effective tax rates; (2) identify qualitative drivers: unrecognized tax benefits, deferred tax assets/liabilities/, valuation allowances, and cross-border/legal exposure; (3) apply a deterministic large-language-model prompt using context engineering; and (4) reconcile human and model conclusions to deliver a concise evidence-based comparative conclusion. Structured worksheets and reflections promote reproducibility and professional skepticism. The paper further provides validated reference analyses, additional guidance, and discusses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) as an optional pathway for source validation and auditability. By linking computational tools with evidence-based reasoning, the study provides a rigorous, ready-to-use framework that accelerates the first-pass reading of dense disclosures while maintaining a central role for human judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: