PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Psychological Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Treatment effect modifiers of virtual reality-based versus standard cognitive behavioral therapy for paranoia in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an exploratory moderator analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics in the FaceYourFears trial

MCMads Juul ChristensenDVDitte Lammers VernalUJUlrik Nykjaer Jeppesen

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify baseline characteristics that modify treatment effects on paranoia in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
  • Exploratory analysis of baseline characteristics in 126 individuals receiving VR-CBTp or standard CBTp.
  • Used general linear and logistic regression models to assess associations with paranoia outcomes.
  • Moderation analyses tested interactions between treatment and specific baseline characteristics.
  • Higher baseline avolition, delusion severity, and cognitive biases were linked to increased end-of-treatment paranoia.
  • Individuals with high avolition or moderate-to-high delusion severity showed greater improvement in VR-CBTp compared to CBTp.
  • No demographic or other clinical characteristics significantly impacted treatment outcomes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study examined baseline characteristics modifying treatment effects on paranoia in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders following a 10-session virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (VR-CBTp) or standard CBTp. METHODS: =126). General linear and logistic regression models examined baseline variables associated with end-of-treatment paranoia. In covariate analyses, regression coefficients quantified associations across treatments. In moderation analyses, interaction terms (randomization x moderator) were tested, with corresponding regression coefficients estimated and assessed at the 25th (low), 50th (medium), and 75th (high) percentiles of continuous variables. RESULTS: Across treatments, higher baseline avolition, safety behavior, delusion severity, and cognitive biases were associated with end-of-treatment paranoia. Moderation analyses revealed interactions for avolition, delusion severity, and negative other-beliefs. Although avolition and delusion severity were associated with poorer outcomes overall, individuals with high avolition and those with moderate-to-high delusion severity improved more in VR-CBTp than CBTp, whereas participants with lower delusion severity showed better outcomes in CBTp. No demographic (age, gender, education, and occupation) or other clinical characteristics (diagnosis, paranoia, social anxiety, depression, anhedonia, total negative symptoms, functioning, core beliefs, or interpersonal trauma) were significantly associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study generates hypotheses for future research, including VR-CBTp's potential to engage individuals with high avolition. Given the modest effects and largely nonsignificant findings, both CBTp and VR-CBTp appear suitable for a wide range of individuals with paranoia, highlighting the importance of considering patient preferences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christensen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f1a015edf4b46824806c75https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291726103870
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper