Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study identifies sertraline as a source of false-positive biomarkers mimicking NPC, suggesting caution in diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Oxysterols (cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol and 7-ketocholesterol) and N-palmitoyl-O-phosphocholineserine (PPCS) are sensitive biomarkers for Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) screening. However, false-positive results occur, with a biomarker profile suggestive of NPC despite the absence of pathogenic variants in genes involved in NPC or other inborn errors of metabolism. OBJECTIVE: To identify causes of false-positive biomarker profiles mimicking NPC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 15 patients with false-positive oxysterols and PPCS profiles referred between 2017 and 2022 to two French NPC reference laboratories. Clinical data were collected via standardized chart review. The impact of Sertraline on NPC-like biological features was evaluated using the filipin test in fibroblasts and biomarker analysis in sertraline-treated patients. RESULTS: Thirteen of 15 patients with false-positive biomarkers were treated with sertraline. Two patients who discontinued sertraline showed normalization of biomarkers. The filipin test revealed that Sertraline disrupts intracellular cholesterol trafficking, a hallmark of NPC cellular features. Finally, among 47 sertraline-treated patients without NPC-suspicion, 26 (55%) had biomarker profile mimicking NPC. INTERPRETATION: Sertraline use is frequently associated with elevated biomarkers that mimic NPC, representing a primary cause of false-positive results in NPC screening. Genetic analysis of NPC1 and NPC2 remains essential to confirm NPC diagnosis. Most sertraline-treated patients with false-positive biomarkers presented predominantly atypical psychiatric symptoms, though one exhibited a clinical picture highly suggestive of NPC following prolonged sertraline exposure. The long-term clinical effects of sertraline use need further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makrygianni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: