Why the study?
To describe an approach for providing cost-effective CRT-D using left bundle branch pacing combined with a dual-chamber ICD.
Does left bundle branch pacing optimized ICD (LOT-ICD) provide effective and cost-effective cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients requiring CRT-D?
Does left bundle branch pacing optimized ICD (LOT-ICD) provide effective and cost-effective cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients requiring CRT-D?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LOT-ICD using a dual-chamber ICD and left bundle branch pacing is a feasible, cost-effective alternative to standard CRT-D with reduced fluoroscopy requirements.
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) involves direct capture of left bundle fibers by placing the lead deep inside the interventricular septum. Several studies have shown the feasibility and efficacy of LBBP as an alternative modality for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This paper describes approach for providing cost effective CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) by LBBP and dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) which we label as LBBP optimized ICD (LOT-ICD). LBBP was performed using C315 sheath and 3830 Selectsecure lead in all patients by premature ventricular complex guided approach. In patients with complete correction of conduction system disease, IS-1 connector plug of the IS-1/DF-1 lead was capped and 3830 lead connected to the dual chamber ICD pulse-generator at RV-P/S port. LOT-ICD provided stable R-wave sensing for arrhythmia monitoring and resulted in cost-effective resynchronization therapy at reduced fluoroscopy duration and radiation dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ponnusamy et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: