Why the study?
Guidelines recommend OAC monotherapy in patients with NVAF and stable CAD 1 year post-PCI, but data regarding shortening the time for de-escalation to edoxaban monotherapy are lacking.
Does edoxaban monotherapy reduce bleeding compared to combination therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease?
Does edoxaban monotherapy reduce bleeding compared to combination therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease?
Edoxaban monotherapy showed acceptable clinical safety with a non-significant trend toward reduced bleeding compared to combination therapy in patients with NVAF and stable CAD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests edoxaban monotherapy may offer acceptable safety in stable CAD with AF; leaves open.
Background: Current guidelines recommend an oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) 1 year postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It might be possible to shorten the time for de-escalation from a dual therapy to monotherapy, but data regarding de-escalation to an edoxaban monotherapy are lacking. This study aimed to assess the clinical safety of an edoxaban monotherapy in patients with NVAF and stable CAD. Methods: = 73). The primary study endpoint was the composite incidence of major bleeding and clinically significant bleeding, defined according to the ISTH criteria. Results: Major or clinically significant bleeding occurred in 2 patients in the monotherapy group (1.67% per patient-year) and in 5 patients in the combination therapy group (4.28% per patient-year) (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-2.02). There was no incidence of a myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unstable angina requiring revascularization, ischemic stroke, systemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke in either of the groups. Conclusions: The edoxaban monotherapy was shown to have acceptable clinical safety in patients with NVAF and stable CAD. The study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180119).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukamachi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: