Why the study?
To evaluate the benefit of speckle tracking radial strain imaging-guided left ventricular lead positioning in cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Does speckle tracking radial strain imaging (STRSI)-guided left ventricular lead positioning improve LV end-systolic volume reduction in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing CRT?
Does speckle tracking radial strain imaging (STRSI)-guided left ventricular lead positioning improve LV end-systolic volume reduction in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing CRT?
Speckle tracking radial strain imaging-guided LV lead placement does not improve echocardiographic or clinical outcomes compared to conventional implantation in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
STRSI-guided LV lead placement confers no benefit over conventional positioning in ischemic CRT; challenges prior assumptions favoring imaging guidance.
AIMS: To evaluate the benefit of speckle tracking radial strain imaging (STRSI)-guided left ventricular (LV) lead (LVL) positioning in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients (pts) with ischaemic cardiomyopathy with CRT indication. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were enrolled in nine centres with 2:1 randomization into two groups (guided vs. control). Patients underwent STRSI to identify the optimal LV position from six LV segments at midventricular level. Implantation via STRSI was attempted for recommended segment in the guided group only. Follow-up included echocardiography (6 months) and clinical evaluation (6 and 12 months). The primary endpoint was comparison % reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months with baseline. Secondary endpoints included hospitalizations for heart failure and death, and improvement in additional echocardiographic measurements and quality of life score. A total of 172 patients (115 guided vs. 57 control) were enrolled. In the guided group, 60% of the implanted LV leads were adjudicated to be successfully located at the recommended segment, whereas in the control group 44% reached the best STRSI determined segment. There was no difference between the groups in any of the primary or secondary endpoints at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that echo-guided implantation of an LV lead using STRSI does not improve the clinical or echocardiographic response compared with conventional implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glikson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: