Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates nitrate's impact on rice root growth through OsCIPK18, suggesting pathways for enhancing nitrogen efficiency.
Nitrate acts as both a nutrient and a signaling molecule to regulate root growth, and this process is closely associated with protein abundance and protein phosphorylation within the nitrogen metabolism pathway. However, the relationship between nitrate-regulated root growth, protein expression and protein phosphorylation remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the function and underlying molecular mechanisms of the calcineurin B-like (CBL)-interacting protein kinase OsCIPK18 in nitrate-modulated rice root growth using phenotypic analyses together with quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of wild-type (WT) plants and cipk18 mutants. Knockdown of OsCIPK18 significantly inhibited rice root growth compared with WT plants. In contrast, 2 mM nitrate significantly promoted root growth in the cipk18 mutant, increasing lateral root length by 65% and radicle length by 24%, whereas these effects were not observed in WT plants. Consistently, knockdown of OsCIPK18 altered the accumulation of nitrogen-related proteins (including GS1;2, OsGS2, OsNADH-GOGAT2 and OsbetaCA2) and the phosphorylation status of the high-affinity nitrate transporter OsNRT2.2 in response to nitrate. Together, these findings reveal a central regulatory role of OsCIPK18 in nitrogen signaling and root development and provide a potential molecular target and theoretical basis for breeding rice varieties with improved nitrogen use efficiency. • OsCIPK18 interacts with OsCBL1 to mediate nitrate-regulated root growth in rice. • The nitrate-responsive phosphoproteome is dependent on OsCIPK18. • Nitrate-induced accumulation of GS1;2, OsGS2 and OsNADH-GOGAT2 requires OsCIPK18. • OsNRT2.2 phosphorylation at S57/T524/S529 is nitrate- and OsCIPK18-dependent. • OsCIPK18 fine-tunes nitrate signaling via OsCRL4 kinase and OsPP18 phosphatase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: