Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management Strategy

William E. Boden; Robert A. O’Rourke; Michael H. Crawford; Alvin Blaustein; Prakash Deedwania; Robert G. Zoble; Laura Wexler; Robert E. Kleiger; Carl J. Pepine; David Ferry; Bruce K. Chow

doi:10.1097/00132586-199910000-00008

October 1, 1999Survey of Anesthesiology

Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management Strategy

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Routine invasive strategy confers no benefit over conservative care in non-Q-wave MI; challenges early routine angiography.

Abstract

Boden, William E.; O'rourke, Robert A.; Crawford, Michael H.; Blaustein, Alvin S.; Deedwania, Prakash C.; Zoble, Robert G.; Wexler, Laura F.; Kleiger, Robert E.; Pepine, Carl J.; Ferry, David R.; Chow, Bruce K. Philip W.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Boden et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f3ee5adc238f819779974b https://doi.org/10.1097/00132586-199910000-00008

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management Strategy

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management Strategy

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading