Key result
TAVR in rheumatoid arthritis is not linked to increased 30-day mortality versus patients without.
Why the study?
Short- and long-term clinical outcomes of TAVR among patients with AS and rheumatoid arthritis compared to those without RA were not well evaluated in real-world data.
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement have similar short- and long-term outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis and rheumatoid arthritis compared to those without rheumatoid arthritis?
Observational (n=40,418)
Yes
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement have similar short- and long-term outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis and rheumatoid arthritis compared to those without rheumatoid arthritis?
Effect estimate: OR 1.29 (95% CI 0.73-2.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 1.5%
TAVR is a safe therapeutic option for patients with aortic stenosis and rheumatoid arthritis, with no excess short- or long-term risk compared to patients without RA.
Affirms early safety for routine clinical use; leaves open modest long-term mortality differences despite extended follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and aortic stenosis (AS) compared with those without RA, using real-world data from a large multicentre registry. METHODS: Using the TriNetX Registry, participants with AS undergoing TAVR with (RA+) vs without RA (RA-) were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated 30-day all-cause mortality, permanent pacemaker implantation, ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, major vascular complications, and major or life-threatening bleeding were evaluated. Five-year outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, MI, and all-cause hospitalization. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: 1,414 RA + (4.3%) and 39 004 RA- participants were eligible. After matching, 1,374 were included in each cohort. At 30 days, outcomes did not differ between RA+ and RA- groups; mortality was 2.0% vs 1.5% (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.73-2.29), with no significant differences in other endpoints. Over 5 years, mortality was 23.8% vs 20.5% (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.97-1.31), and stroke, MI, and hospitalization were similar; HRs were concordant with OR estimates. In sex-based analyses of RA patients, outcomes did not differ by sex. CONCLUSION: In this large observational study, TAVR was not associated with excess short- or long-term risk in patients with RA. These findings support TAVR as a safe therapeutic option in RA patients with aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramadan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis and rheumatoid arthritis (n=40,418). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis vs. TAVR in patients without rheumatoid arthritis was evaluated on 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.73-2.29). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis was not associated with increased 30-day mortality compared to those without (2.0% vs 1.5%; OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.73-2.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: