Key result
RYGB linked to greater structural reverse remodeling and LVMI reduction vs. SG.
Why the study?
It remains unclear whether structural and functional cardiac recovery differ between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and how much these changes are driven by weight loss versus metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms.
Does Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improve structural and functional cardiac reverse remodeling compared to sleeve gastrectomy in adults with severe obesity?
Cohort (n=100)
Does Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improve structural and functional cardiac reverse remodeling compared to sleeve gastrectomy in adults with severe obesity?
Absolute Event Rate: -12% vs -6.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Bariatric surgery induces significant cardiac reverse remodeling at 6 months, with RYGB yielding greater structural regression than sleeve gastrectomy, while functional improvements are driven by metabolic and inflammatory restoration.
Superior remodeling with RYGB should not guide bariatric procedure selection; leaves open metabolic benefits independent of weight loss.
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is associated with characteristic cardiac remodeling, including left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, concentric geometry, and subclinical myocardial dysfunction. Bariatric surgery induces reverse cardiac remodeling; however, it remains unclear whether structural and functional recovery differ between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and to what extent these changes are driven by weight loss versus metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms. METHOD: In this prospective observational cohort study, 100 adults with severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 35 kg/m²) undergoing primary bariatric surgery (SG, n = 50; RYGB, n = 50) were evaluated at baseline and six months postoperatively. Clinical, metabolic, inflammatory, and echocardiographic parameters-including left ventricular mass index (LVMI), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness, diastolic function, and global longitudinal strain (GLS)-were assessed using standardized transthoracic echocardiography with speckle-tracking analysis. Multivariable regression identified independent predictors of structural (ΔLVMI) and functional (ΔGLS) improvement. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (mean age 35.9 years; 67% female; BMI 47.1 kg/m²). Both procedures resulted in significant improvements in anthropometric, metabolic, inflammatory, and cardiac parameters. RYGB was associated with greater reductions in BMI (-10.74 +- 2.42 vs. -9.32 +- 2.42 kg/m²; P = 0.004), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (median -1.40% vs. -0.90%; P = 0.007), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (P = 0.029). Structural reverse remodeling was more pronounced following RYGB, with greater reductions in LVMI (median -12.0 vs. -6.5 g/m²·⁷; P < 0.001) and EAT thickness (-1.20 vs. -0.70 mm; P = 0.014). GLS improved in both groups (-2.33% vs. -1.40%; P = 0.031). However, multivariable analysis demonstrated that improvement in GLS was independently associated with baseline GLS, reduction in LV mass, and improvements in HbA1c and CRP, rather than the type of surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery leads to significant reverse cardiac remodeling in patients with severe obesity. RYGB is associated with greater structural regression, whereas improvement in myocardial deformation appears to be primarily driven by metabolic improvement and inflammatory changes rather than surgical technique. These findings suggest that cardiac recovery reflects an integrated process involving structural, metabolic, and inflammatory restoration beyond weight loss alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maher et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in severe obesity (n=100). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was evaluated on Reduction in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=<0.001). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass led to greater structural reverse remodeling than sleeve gastrectomy, with a greater reduction in left ventricular mass index (median -12.0 vs. -6.5 g/m²·⁷; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: