Key result
Isometric exercise training reduced diastolic blood pressure significantly more in normal-BMI individuals compared to high-BMI individuals.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether adiposity influences the blood pressure-lowering response to isometric exercise training.
Does home-based lower-body isometric exercise training reduce blood pressure in individuals with normal to high-normal systolic BP, and is this response modulated by BMI?
RCT (n=80)
Open-label
Computer-generated randomisation
No
Does home-based lower-body isometric exercise training reduce blood pressure in individuals with normal to high-normal systolic BP, and is this response modulated by BMI?
Effect estimate: Difference -6.0 mmHg
Absolute Event Rate: -8.5% vs -2.6%
p-value: p=0.015
Isometric exercise training lowers blood pressure, but the magnitude of reduction is significantly attenuated in individuals with higher BMI.
OBJECTIVES: Obesity is characterised by excess adipose tissue, which impairs vascular function and blood pressure (BP) regulation. However, it remains unclear whether adiposity influences the BP-lowering response to isometric exercise training (IET). This randomised-controlled trial explored the impact of body mass index on BP and cardiovascular adaptation following IET. METHODS: 80 participants with normal to high-normal systolic BP (range 120-140 mmHg) were recruited for the study. Participants were randomised into two BMI groups: normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m²; n=40) and high BMI (25-34.9 kg/m²; n=40) and then either performed home-based lower-body IET, 3 times per week, for 4 weeks (each session comprised 4 x 2-minute bouts), or were allocated to the control group. Cardiovascular variables, including BP, total peripheral resistance (TPR), and heart rate variability (HRV), were measured at rest pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Overall, there were significant reductions in systolic BP, diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the IET group compared to control. However, the normal-BMI group had significantly greater reductions in diastolic BP (- 8.5 [- 11.8, - 5.3] mmHg) and MAP (- 9.2 [- 11.9, - 6.6] mmHg) compared to the high-BMI group (dBP: - 2.6 [- 6.2, 1.1]; MAP: -4.7 [- 7.6, - 1.8]). Although TPR was significantly greater in the high-BMI group at week 4 (p=0.022), it was also elevated at baseline, and change-score analyses revealed no significant between-group difference in the magnitude of TPR reduction (Δ p=0.964). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that BMI may modulate the BP-lowering response to IET, suggesting that individuals with higher BMI may require adjunctive or prolonged interventions to optimise BP reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swift et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Normal to high-normal systolic blood pressure (n=80). Isometric exercise training (IET) vs. High-BMI IET group was evaluated on Change in diastolic blood pressure (dBP) (Difference -6.0 mmHg, p=0.015). Isometric exercise training reduced diastolic blood pressure significantly more in normal-BMI individuals compared to high-BMI individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: