Qualitative study explores bullying effects on nursing students in clinical settings, highlighting the need for preventive measures.
Background/Objectives: Nursing students are often exposed to bullying in clinical settings. Bullying in a practice environment is an important issue that causes psychological, physical, and mental health problems in nursing students. However, in South Korea, few qualitative studies have examined bullying among nursing students in clinical practice environments. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of bullying among South Korean nursing students during clinical practice. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study using a semi-structured interview guide was employed to collect data from nursing students in a focus group. Overall, three focus groups were used, with seven students in each group comprising males and females. The sample size was based on data saturation and saturated on three focus group discussions, giving a sample size of 21. Purposeful sampling was used to select students who had completed one or more semesters of clinical practice (six credits, 270 h) from two nursing colleges. Interviews were conducted in May 2025. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s method. Results: A total of 23 meaning units, 14 themes, and 7 thematic clusters were identified. Seven overarching thematic clusters emerged: (1) exposure to harsh speech; (2) experiencing physical harm; (3) being considered a sexual object; (4) disrespected as a nursing student; (5) assigned tasks beyond an individual’s capabilities; (6) restricted educational opportunities corresponding to clinical practice objectives; and (7) discriminatory treatment due to healthcare professionals’ prejudice. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for raising the awareness of bullying and applying the strategies to prevent bullying and protect nursing students during clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: