Why the study?
Efforts to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy through team-based care may affect outcomes in patients with HFrEF, but the impact of a dedicated medication optimization clinic required evaluation.
Does a medication optimization clinic reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF not receiving optimal GDMT?
Does a medication optimization clinic reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF not receiving optimal GDMT?
A multidisciplinary medication optimization clinic significantly improves GDMT prescription rates and reduces short-term heart failure hospitalizations in HFrEF patients.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“It proves difficult to get patients on quadruple therapy. We need to add on four medications, two of which have significant dose increment adjustments, so it typically takes an extended period of time.”
Medication optimization clinics may overcome GDMT underuse in HFrEF; leaves open causality pending randomized trials before practice change.
Efforts to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) through team-based care may affect outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study evaluated the impact of an innovative medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF who are not receiving optimal GDMT are referred to MOC and managed by a team comprised of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, clinical pharmacist, and HF cardiologist. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of MOC (n = 206) compared with usual care (n = 412) with a 2:1 propensity-matched control group. The primary clinical outcome was the incidence of HF hospitalizations at 3 months after the index visit. Kaplan-Meier cumulative event curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustment were conducted. A significantly higher proportion of patients in MOC received quadruple therapy (49% vs 4%, p <0.0001), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (60% vs 27%, p <0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (59% vs 37%, p <0.0001), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (60% vs 10%, p <0.0001). The primary outcome was significantly lower in the MOC versus the control group (log-rank, p = 0.0008). Cox regression showed that patients in the control group were more than threefold more likely to be hospitalized because of HF than those in the MOC group (p = 0.0014). In conclusion, the MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risk of HF hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coons et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: