Why the study?
The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of early and rapid initiation of quadruple therapy (four drugs in 4 weeks) for HFrEF in a real-world clinical setting had not been evaluated.
Does early and rapid initiation of quadruple therapy (four drugs in 4 weeks) improve clinical outcomes in patients with de novo HFrEF?
Does early and rapid initiation of quadruple therapy (four drugs in 4 weeks) improve clinical outcomes in patients with de novo HFrEF?
Early and rapid initiation of quadruple therapy in selected patients with de novo HFrEF is feasible, safe, and associated with a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization or death.
May support rapid quadruple therapy in selected de novo HFrEF; leaves open causal benefit in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of early and rapid initiation of quadruple therapy (four drugs in 4 weeks - '4×4 approach') for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients in a real-world clinical setting. DESIGN: Prospective service evaluation study. SETTING: Secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with de novo HFrEF between March and August 2021. INTERVENTION: '4×4 approach' - individualised initiation and up-titration of four pillars of HFrEF therapy by heart failure specialist. MAIN OUTCOME: Proportion of patients initiated on four pillars of HFrEF therapy within 4 weeks. RESULTS: Of 100 patients approached, 19 patients were not suitable for the rapid initiation and up-titration pathway due to severe frailty and significant comorbidities. 81 patients were enrolled (61% male, median age = 73 years, median N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] = 3,764 ng/L). 39 patients (48%) achieved 4×4. Of the 42 patients who did not, 26 (62%), nine (21%) and seven (17%) patients were on three drugs, two drugs and one drug, respectively. 33 patients had one or more contraindication at the outset; most commonly renal impairment (28%), bradycardia (18%) and hyperkalaemia (15%). Five patients experienced significant side effects during medication up-titration, most commonly symptomatic hypotension. During median follow-up of 554 days, 32 (40%) patients experienced the combined outcome (all-cause hospitalisation/death). Patients who did not achieve 4×4 had an increased risk of the combined outcome (HR 2.25 [1.09-4.68], p=0.029) compared to those who achieved 4×4. CONCLUSION: Early and rapid initiation of four pillars HFrEF therapy is clinically feasible and safe when implemented in selected patients and is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sze et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: