Why the study?
Very few reports of long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure have been published, prompting a need to define very-long-term survival and factors associated with Ross-related failure.
What are the very-long-term survival and reintervention rates following the Ross procedure in adults compared to the general population?
What are the very-long-term survival and reintervention rates following the Ross procedure in adults compared to the general population?
The Ross procedure in adults provides excellent long-term freedom from reintervention, but long-term survival remains significantly lower than that of the age- and sex-matched general population.
Supports Ross in select young adults; leaves open randomized validation of long-term durability versus prosthetic AVR.
BACKGROUND: Very few reports of long-term outcomes of patients who underwent the Ross procedure have been published. OBJECTIVES: The authors reviewed their 25-year experience with the Ross procedure with the aim of defining very-long-term survival and factors associated with Ross-related failure. METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2014, the Ross procedure was performed in 310 adults (mean age 40.8 years) at a single institution. All patients were prospectively added to a dedicated cardiac surgery registry. Complete post-operative clinical examination and history were obtained, and transthoracic echocardiography was performed according to a standardized protocol. There was no loss to follow-up. Median follow-up was 15.1 years and up to 25 years. RESULTS: Bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed in 227 patients (73.2%), and the most common indication for surgery was aortic stenosis (n = 225 [72.6%]). Freedom from any Ross-related reintervention was 92.9% and 70.1% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. Independent risk factors for pulmonary autograft degeneration were pre-operative large aortic annulus (hazard ratio: 1.1; p = 0.01), pre-operative aortic insufficiency (hazard ratio: 2.7; p = 0.002), and concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta (hazard ratio: 7.7; p = 0.0003). There were 4 hospital deaths (1.3%), and overall survival at 10 and 20 years was 94.1% and 83.6%, respectively. Long-term survival was not significantly different in patients who required Ross-related reintervention (log-rank p = 0.70). However, compared with the general population, survival was significantly lower in patients following the Ross procedure when matched on age and sex (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure was associated with excellent long-term valvular outcomes and survival, regardless of the need for reintervention. Adults presenting with aortic insufficiency or a dilated aortic annulus or ascending aorta were at greater risk for reintervention. Unlike previous reports, long-term survival was lower in Ross patients compared with matched subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: