Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates control strategies for improving temperature stability in liquid-cooled data centers, indicating enhanced performance and responsiveness.
High power servers are accelerating adoption of cold plate liquid cooling in data centers, but control-chain latency and thermal inertia can delay regulation after load changes and trigger transient swings that threaten temperature stability. This study develops a delay-aware Modelica model for a liquid cooled data center and validates it against measured operating conditions. To compare control options, a standardized percentage step-test protocol is proposed with three indicators—dynamic response time, dynamic fluctuation amplitude, and dynamic fluctuation ratio. Step-response simulations evaluate three single actuator strategies (constant differential pressure valve control, primary side variable flow pumping, and cooling tower outlet temperature control), and a combined condition database is built for coordinated pump–fan control with operating-point matching. Valve control responds fastest (38.3–41.3 s) but produces the largest fluctuations; variable flow pumping is smoother with response times of 44.2–72.9 s; and cooling tower temperature control is most stable but slowest (684–826 s). The optimized combined strategy reallocates control authority across operating conditions, reducing response time from 688.3 s to 73.7 s and lowering dynamic temperature swing risk by up to 1.3 °C. These results support load-responsive, plant-level transient-safe operation of liquid-cooled data-center cooling plants, particularly for secondary-side supply temperature control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: