Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pump work in liquid-cooled data centres scales with the cube of flow rate, so the choice of controlled variable sets the achievable energy floor. Existing pump controllers regulate temperature — the result of the thermal balance — although the heat load (IT power), its cause, is directly readable from power distribution units. Here we show that replacing temperature feedback with a closed-form feedforward from IT power reduces pump work by 56.2% and peak junction temperature by 5.14 °C, against a temperature controller tuned over 90 parameter sets, in a 90 kW rack under a 30%→100% step. Conversely, a 300 s look-ahead increases pump work by 45.5% without changing peak temperature, because required flow is an instantaneous function of power. Inter-rack reallocation is likewise infeasible: each lower bound is set by its own load and cannot be transferred. The gain lies in the observed variable, not in algorithmic sophistication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: