Review consolidates knowledge on chikungunya virus sensing, immune response, and implications for therapy.
Alphavirus chikungunya (CHIKV) is an arthritogenic virus whose innate recognition is primarily driven by pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), sensed by a variety of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLR), and cytosolic RIG-like receptors. CHIKV infection elicits a multifaceted interplay between viral replication strategies and host innate immune recognition. Among these pathways, TLR-mediated sensing emerges as a central axis of antiviral defense, orchestrating type I interferon responses and inflammatory cascades that determine the balance between viral clearance and immunopathology. In parallel, inflammasomes such as NLRP3 amplify the IL-1β/IL-18 axis, being a major contributing factor for the establishment of chronic joint inflammation. The transition from self-limited rapid resolving infection to chronic disease is largely determined by the cytokine and chemokine milieu. It is known that acute infection is characterized by high levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, which drive fever, myalgia, and joint inflammation; and chemokines such as CCL2 (MCP-1) were shown to recruit monocytes and macrophages to inflamed joints, whereas CXCL9/10 (MIG/IP-10) enhance T-cell trafficking, contributing to viral clearance but also sustaining tissue inflammation. In this review, we aim to consolidate the current knowledge on the molecular pathways that sense CHIKV infection and trigger the antiviral innate response that can act as both protective and pathogenic. By integrating viral evasion strategies and host factors, we provide a comprehensive framework for understanding innate immunity in CHIKV infection, its implications for therapeutic design, and important gaps that can guide future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: