Key result
Vericiguat, when added to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure, was associated with a borderline, non-significant reduction in the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.92).
Why the study?
Vericiguat has demonstrated potential benefit in patients with worsening HFrEF, but results across randomized trials have been inconsistent.
Does vericiguat added to guideline-directed medical therapy reduce the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=12,877)
Does vericiguat added to guideline-directed medical therapy reduce the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-1.00)
p-value: p=0.05
In a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, adding vericiguat to guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients resulted in a borderline, non-significant reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a major global health burden, with mortality continuing to rise despite therapeutic advances. Vericiguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, has demonstrated potential benefit in patients with worsening HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), although results across randomized trials have been inconsistent. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant articles from inception through September 30th, 2025. Outcomes were reported as pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as a 95% confidence interval not crossing 1.0 with a two-tailed p-value < 0.05. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 12,877 patients (6857 in the vericiguat group and 6020 in the placebo group) were included. Vericiguat demonstrated a borderline but non-significant reduction in composite outcome of cardiovascular death (CVD) or hospitalization for HF (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85–1.00; p = 0.05), hospitalization for HF (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85–1.02; p = 0.14), and all-cause mortality (ACM) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81–1.01; p = 0.07). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that Vericiguat, when added to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure, was associated with a borderline, non-significant reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, as well as all-cause mortality. Further large-scale randomized trials are warranted to better define its clinical benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasir et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=12,877). Vericiguat vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.00, p=0.05). Vericiguat, when added to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure, was associated with a borderline, non-significant reduction in the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: