Examines how work-life conflict and coaching affect employee well-being, suggesting vital organizational insights.
In today's complex workplace environments, understanding the drivers of employee engagement and well-being is essential. This study draws on data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (N = 33,063) and applies Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine how key workplace dynamics shape these outcomes. The analysis focuses on the effects of work-life conflict, life-work conflict, supervisory coaching, gender diversity, and personal life factors. Results confirm the negative impact of work-life conflict on both engagement and well-being, while life-work conflict, although reducing engagement, unexpectedly enhances subjective well-being by providing meaning through personal responsibilities. Supervisory coaching emerged as a strong positive driver of both outcomes, and the proportion of women in the workplace was linked to improved well-being. Household size also showed a dual role, increasing conflict but contributing positively to well-being. These findings highlight the dual-edged nature of conflict and the resource-providing role of supportive leadership and family responsibilities, offering valuable insights for organizational policies and interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: