Randomized trial evaluates Janus Coprime Algebra effects on LEO object dynamics, suggesting significant improvements in satellite management.
We introduce the Janus Coprime Algebra (JCA): a structured operator class on the coprime residue lattice (Z/m)* for squarefree primorial m, defined by two independent axioms — bi-involutive equivariance and exact rank-4 invariant subspace V_4. The CREM commutator C(m) = [D_sym, P_tau] is the first known member; this paper documents three more: the sigma-tau tensor decomposition operator pair, the cyclic sigma-flux drive Hamiltonian family, and the tau-equivariant embedding family. The two axioms are independent: a kernel substitution test against five non-tent kernels shows bi-involutive equivariance does not force rank-4 collapse. V_4 is exactly invariant — relative leakage stays at the IEEE 754 floor (10^-15) at every primorial through the 8th. The 4D braid evaluates in approximately 280 microseconds at every primorial tested, including phi(m) = 1,658,880, with 9 percent wall-time variation across 3,456-fold substrate growth. The Kessler critical-surface case study deploys JCA on the live ESA DISCOSweb LEO catalog (49,998 objects). The conjunction graph is 116 times super-critical; halving the giant component requires deorbiting 2,424 objects (2.9x leverage over random). Fiedler eigenvalue 1.01 times 10^-5 identifies Anderson-localization-consistent quantum-walk dynamics. Substrate-native Grover at K = ceiling(pi/4 times square-root of 92,160) = 238 exact iterations identifies the maximum-exposure target with textbook query-count quadratic speedup. The bundle includes 24 reproducibility scripts — including substrate_daily.py for daily-refresh Fiedler telemetry against the live catalog — and the full pipeline runs in 7.3 minutes on a consumer laptop. Patent reservation: U.S. Provisional Patent Applications 64/031,440, 64/033,689, 64/048,617, and 64/054,093.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonio Matos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: