Why the study?
Does MR imaging accurately assess morphologic and functional abnormalities compared to angiography in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease?
Does MR imaging accurately assess morphologic and functional abnormalities compared to angiography in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease?
MR imaging is a viable, non-invasive alternative to angiography and biopsy for assessing right ventricular morphologic and functional abnormalities in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports MR as potential non-invasive option in arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Auffermann et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: