Key result
Higher systemic immune-inflammation index is linked to worse 90-day outcomes after thrombolysis in ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Does the systemic immune-inflammation index predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis?
Cohort (n=278)
Does the systemic immune-inflammation index predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An early increase in the systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with unfavorable 3-month clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.
INTRODUCTION: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been proven to predict the outcome in cancerous and non-cancerous diseases. We aimed to investigate the relationship between SII and other inflammatory markers and the prognosis in patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS: Acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT were collected retrospectively. SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were constructed based on admission blood testing. Favorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale of less than or equal to 2 at 90 days. In addition to outcome, cerebral edema was analyzed. The severity of brain edema was graded into three levels according to Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study. Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) was defined as brain edema with midline shift. RESULTS: 278 patients were included. 140 (50.4%) achieved favorable outcome, 35 (12.6%) developed MCE. In patients with favorable outcomes, the levels of SII, NLR and PLR were lower compared to those with unfavorable outcomes [422.33 (258.69-624.68) vs 1269.83 (750.82-2497.22), p < 0.001; 2.73 (1.68-4.40) vs 4.76 (2.59-7.72), p < 0.001; 92.98 (62.35-126.24) vs 115.64 (85.51-179.04), p < 0.001]. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was 0.698 for SII (95% CI = 0.637-0.760, p < 0.001), 0.694 for NLR (95% CI = 0.632-0.756, p < 0.001), 0.643 for PLR (95% CI = 0.579-0.707, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off values were 652.73 for SII (sensitivity 0.572, specificity 0.786), 3.57 for NLR (sensitivity 0.659, specificity 0.693), 127.01 for PLR (sensitivity 0.457, specificity 0.757). CONCLUSIONS: An early increase in SII levels was related to 3 months of unfavorable outcomes in AIS patients after IVT. However, it is not associated with malignant edema.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=278). Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was evaluated on Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2 at 90 days) (AUC 0.698, 95% CI 0.637-0.760, p=< 0.001). Higher systemic immune-inflammation index levels were associated with unfavorable 90-day outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: