PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026Buildings2 citationsOpen Access

Demographic Patterns in the Aesthetic Acceptance of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics in Apartment Housing: Implications for Solar Energy Design and Policy

View Full Paper
JQJenan Abu QadourahSASaba AlnusairatRHRund Hiyasat

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand how demographic and socioeconomic factors influence aesthetic perceptions of building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV).
  • Survey of 418 respondents using visual scenarios of PV installations
  • Data analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, multiple regression, and thematic analyses
  • Evaluated aesthetic responses to various forms of BIPV integration such as rooftops and facades.
  • Younger and more educated respondents showed higher acceptance of BIPV designs
  • Architecture professionals were more critical of prominent designs
  • Rooftop PV received the highest ratings while facade and balcony systems had mixed reactions.

Abstract

This study examines how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics shape the aesthetic perception of building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) in apartment housing. A survey of 418 respondents was conducted using visual scenarios showing PV integrated into rooftops, facades, balconies, and windows. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Scheffé post hoc tests, multiple regression, and thematic analysis of open-ended responses. The results indicate that aesthetic responses to BIPV are not uniform across user groups. Younger respondents, participants with higher educational attainment, and respondents working in energy or technical fields tended to be more receptive to certain forms of BIPV integration, while architecture and design professionals were generally more critical of visually dominant applications. Rooftop PV received the highest overall ratings, while façade- and balcony-integrated applications generated greater disagreement. The regression models explained only a limited share of the variance, indicating that demographic factors are associated with broad perception patterns but do not strongly predict individual aesthetic judgement. The study offers context-specific evidence for facade-sensitive design guidance, retrofit prioritisation, and targeted stakeholder engagement in Jordan, with only cautious relevance to comparable settings pending cross-cultural validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qadourah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f837423ed186a7399815a4https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16091758
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Integrating aesthetics and sustainability: evaluating the aesthetic perception of photovoltaic installation on the apartment building façade in Jordan2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Identifying Factors Influencing Local Acceptance of Renewable Energy Projects: A Systematic Review2025 · 9 citations
  3. 3Toward climate-responsive zoning: microscale simulation of building coverage ratio effects on outdoor thermal comfort in a semi-arid city2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) Development Knowledge Map: A Review of Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace2023 · 30 citations
  5. 5Photovoltaic Breakthrough in Architecture: Integration and Innovation Best Practice2023 · 5 citations