Randomized trial evaluates antioxidant contents in tomato landraces through phenotypic selection, suggesting potential for enhanced quality.
Tomato landraces possess distinct flavors, colors, textures and aromas, making them suitable for traditional cuisine. Tomato landraces contain a wide range of genes, including those involved in fruit quality, that can be isolated and used in local breeding programs. In regions recognized as centers of origin, domestication and diversification, traditional farmers play an important role in the preservation of tomato landraces adapted to local conditions and agricultural practices, on the whole maintaining high genetic diversity. This work aimed to evaluate the effects of the crop cycle (C), genotype (G) and C × G interactions on the contents of soluble solids, reducing sugars, lycopene, total polyphenols, flavonoids, and vitamin C, as well as the pH and antioxidant activity, in fifteen tomato landraces (genotypes) undergoing phenotypic selection and a commercial tomato variety (control). All the varieties were grown in two crop cycles under uniform greenhouse management using a randomized block design with four repetitions. Fruit composition was analyzed with AOAC and spectrophotometric methods. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) were detected in the soluble solid content, pH, flavor and maturity indices, polyphenol and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity between C, G and C × G interactions. In contrast, titratable acidity, reducing sugars, lycopene and vitamin C did not differ between cycles. Coefficients of phenotypic and genotypic variation and broad-sense heritability (H2) ranged from 4.3 to 33.7, 2.0 to 19.0, and 3.2 to 63.5%, respectively. H2 for bioactive compounds ranged from moderate to slightly high (16.3–38.8%). These findings, supported by laboratory analyses, suggest that genotypes under agronomic selection have potential as parents to enhance fruit quality in current and future breeding programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montesinos-Cortes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: