Key result
Review summarizes clinical trial insights for FDA-approved heart failure therapies including RAASi, ARNIs, and SGLT2i.
Why the study?
Heart failure is a growing global health and economic burden with multiple available drug classes, warranting a review of pathophysiology, FDA-approved therapeutic agents, and insights from clinical studies.
This article reviews the pathophysiology of heart failure and summarizes current FDA-approved therapeutic agents and insights from corresponding clinical trials.
Heart failure (HF) is a global burden and, irrespective of age, sex, race, nationality, and geography, affects individuals across the world. Several reports mentioned that, globally, more than 64 million people, which accounts for 1% to 3% of the total global population, are living with HF. In the United States, approximately 6.7 million people older than 20 years have some form of HF, and it is expected to rise to 8.5 million (approximately 3% of the US population) by 2030. HF was linked to 85,037 deaths in 2021, which was 45.8% higher than in 2011. The direct and indirect healthcare costs to treat and manage HF keep increasing both in the United States and around the world. There are several different classes of therapeutic agents available to treat HF. The current recommended therapies include the following drug classes: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, diuretics, β-blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors. The present article reviews the pathophysiology of HF and focuses on the Food and Drug Administration-approved HF therapeutic agents and insights from corresponding clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. FDA-approved heart failure therapeutic agents was evaluated. FDA-approved therapeutic agents for heart failure, including RAAS inhibitors, ARNIs, diuretics, beta-blockers, and SGLT2 inhibitors, are reviewed alongside their clinical trial insights.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: