Randomized trial examines the impact of transport-led restructuring on land-environment coordination in counties, indicating varied responses across regions.
The Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) coordinated-development strategy provides a county-level setting for examining how transport-led regional restructuring reshaped the relationship between human activity and land–environment conditions. Using a balanced panel of 200 county-level units from 2010 to 2020, we work with two linked subsystems: the human-activity subsystem (H), which combines transport integration and economic upgrading, and the land–environment subsystem (L), which combines land-use transition and ecological response. Pooled entropy weighting, a coupling-coordination index, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and fixed-effects differential-response models are used to trace temporal change, spatial clustering, and post-2014 heterogeneity within BTH. Mean coupling coordination (D) rose from 0.5430 to 0.6012, but the increase came mainly from the rise of H, while L changed only slightly. Positive spatial autocorrelation persisted throughout the period. Counties in the Beijing–Tianjin ring kept higher absolute coordination levels, yet after 2014, they improved more slowly than non-ring counties because land–environment adjustment lagged behind changes within H. Relative to key ecological function zones, agricultural counties—and to a lesser extent urbanized counties—posted faster gains in D, again mainly through H. The results show that in BTH, regional integration did not move the two subsystems in lockstep: transport reorganization and economic upgrading advanced faster than land–environment adjustment, so durable county coordination still depended on land governance, ecological regulation, and policies matched to territorial functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: