Review addresses integration of smart ports and shipping optimization for resilience, highlighting research gaps.
Geopolitical volatility and conflict are increasingly altering the operating conditions of maritime transport by affecting route feasibility, service reliability, port operations, regulatory compliance, and energy-related decisions. However, the relevant literature remains fragmented across smart port studies, shipping optimization research, cybersecurity analysis, and resilience-oriented discussions. This review addresses that fragmentation by examining smart port and shipping optimization as interdependent components of maritime resilience rather than as separate efficiency-oriented domains. Methodologically, the paper adopts a structured, semi-systematic review design combining bibliometric mapping and thematic synthesis to identify the evolution, thematic structure, and major research gaps of the field. The review shows that smart port research highlights the resilience value of real-time visibility, interoperable data exchange, dynamic terminal control, digital twins, and cyber-secure infrastructure, while shipping-optimization research emphasizes conflict-aware routing, schedule recovery, network redesign, capacity reallocation, and fuel-related decision support. At the same time, the literature provides only limited integration across the port–shipping interface, where resilience is actually produced through coordination between nodes, networks, and governance arrangements. Based on this synthesis, the paper argues that future research should move beyond isolated technical solutions and develop more integrated approaches that jointly address digitalization, operational adaptation, security, and decarbonization under geopolitical stress. The review contributes by clarifying the intellectual structure of this emerging field and by proposing a more system-oriented perspective on maritime resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: