This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article develops empirically based guidelines to help managers select typefaces that affect strategically valued impressions. The authors discuss the potential trade-offs among the impressions created by typeface (e.g., pleasing, engaging, reassuring, prominent). The selection of typeface can be simplified with the use of six underlying design dimensions: elaborate, harmony, natural, flourish, weight, and compressed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: