Why the study?
As implantations of pacemakers and ICDs increase, a basic understanding of device troubleshooting is essential because loss of capture can present emergently with potential morbidity and mortality.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Understanding the acute and chronic causes of loss of capture in pacemakers and ICDs is essential for healthcare providers to manage potentially life-threatening device-related issues.
The number of patients with implantable electronic cardiac devices is continuously increasing. As more pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are being placed, a basic understanding of some troubleshooting for devices is becoming essential. Loss of capture can be an emergent presentation for an unstable patient and can be encountered intermittently in hospitalized patients. There are many causes for a loss of capture, with the timing of the implant having a high correlation with certain causes over others. The most common acute cause just after the insertion procedure is lead dislodgement or malposition. In comparison, an increase in the required threshold promoting a loss of capture can happen after months to years of insertion of the pacemaker or ICD. This change can be due to a cardiomyopathy, fibrosis medications, metabolic imbalance, lead fracture, or an exit block. Loss of capture can also occur from external electrical stimuli and inappropriate pacemaker or ICD settings. Further, there are also potential noncardiac causes, such as medications, electrolyte imbalance, and acidemia. A knowledge of these factors is essential for health care providers, given the morbidity and mortality that can potentially be associated with device-related issues, especially in patients who are dependent on the included pacing function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabbagh et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: