Key result
Mitral E/A ratio >1.5 is linked to ~73% higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The prognostic significance of low or high mitral E/A ratio in older adults remains to be elucidated in population-based samples.
Does an abnormal mitral E/A ratio predict all-cause and cardiac mortality in middle-aged and elderly adults?
Cohort (n=3,008)
Does an abnormal mitral E/A ratio predict all-cause and cardiac mortality in middle-aged and elderly adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A restrictive left ventricular filling pattern (E/A >1.5) on Doppler echocardiography is an independent predictor of cardiac mortality in middle-aged and elderly adults, whereas an impaired relaxation pattern (E/A <0.6) is not.
BACKGROUND: With aging, left ventricular filling tends to decrease in early diastole, reducing the mitral ratio of peak early to late diastolic filling velocity (E/A). However, the prognostic significance of low or high E/A in older adults remains to be elucidated in population-based samples. METHODS AND RESULTS: Doppler echocardiograms were analyzed in 3008 American Indian participants in the second Strong Heart Study examination who had no more than mild mitral or aortic regurgitation. Participants were followed for a mean of 3 years after Doppler echocardiography to assess risks of all-cause and cardiac death associated with E/A <0.6 or >1.5; 2429 (81%) participants had normal E/A ratio, 490 (16%) had E/A <0.6, and 89 (3%) had E/A >1.5. All-cause mortality was higher with E/A <0.6 or E/A >1.5 (12% and 13% versus 6%), as was cardiac mortality (4.5% and 6.5% versus 1.6%; both P<0.001). Adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, HDL and LDL cholesterol, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and low ejection fraction (<40%), the relative risk of all-cause death with E/A >1.5 was 1.73 (95% CI, 0.99 to 3.03; P=0.05); the relative risk of cardiac death was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.19 to 6.75; P<0.05). E/A <0.6 was not independently associated with increased all-cause or cardiac mortality (P=0.19 and 0.31, respectively) after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based sample of middle-aged and elderly adults, mitral E/A >1.5 at baseline Doppler echocardiography is associated with 2-fold increased all-cause and 3-fold increased cardiac mortality independent of covariates; mitral E/A <0.6 was also associated with 2-fold increased all-cause and cardiac mortality but not independent of covariates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bella et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Middle-aged and elderly adults (n=3,008). Mitral E/A ratio >1.5 vs. Normal E/A ratio (0.6 to 1.5) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.99-3.03, p=0.05). A mitral E/A ratio >1.5 was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.73; 95% CI 0.99-3.03; P=0.05) and cardiac death (RR 2.8; 95% CI 1.19-6.75) compared to a normal ratio.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: